Welcome back to Hitting the Bid Weekly!
On deck this week…
Leadership narrowing
Wednesday: Fed day meets big tech earnings
Meta: The cost of conviction
Running a full book
Around the Market
Mega-cap tech continues to carry the tape while breadth and small caps lag
Equities closed the week on a constructive note, but the story beneath the surface was more nuanced than the headline strength suggested. The Nasdaq $QQQ ( ▼ 1.51% ) led from the front, pushing higher behind continued momentum in mega-cap tech, while the S&P 500 $SPY ( ▼ 1.2% ) lagged slightly and the Russell $IWM ( ▼ 2.41% ) struggled to keep pace.
Concentrated strength in semiconductors is driving the divergence. Investors continue crowding into quality growth with strong balance sheets and AI exposure, while small caps remain more tethered to rate expectations and tighter financial conditions.
On Sunday, futures opened lower on geopolitical headlines and renewed macro uncertainty, but the move was quickly faded. The lack of follow-through selling, combined with still-elevated cash on the sidelines, created the conditions for a fast gap fill within hours as buyers stepped back in.
Looking ahead, focus shifts to a heavy earnings slate alongside key macro data, including inflation and labor updates. IWM continues consolidating, and SPY momentum has started to cool. With QQQ extended and breadth still lagging, the big question is whether participation broadens from here or leadership remains concentrated at the top.
Focus Points:
Earnings Gauntlet: Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon report Wednesday, followed by Apple on Thursday. This is shaping up to be a major test for the AI narrative.
Macro Volatility: The Fed meeting is the centerpiece this week. No rate change is expected, but the press conference could determine whether yields continue pressuring small caps.
Inflation Incoming: PCE inflation drops Thursday and is expected to show a modest uptick. Will equities continue brushing it off?

Daily chart of SPY over 1Y time interval
Key market moves this past week:
Closing Price (Monday) | Week/Week $ Change | Week/Week % Change | |
|---|---|---|---|
$715.17 | $6.45 | 0.9% | |
$664.23 | $17.44 | 2.7% | |
$277.14 | -$0.21 | -0.1% | |
$18.02 | -$0.85 | -4.5% | |
$4,694 | -$135 | -2.8% | |
$113.69 | -$0.97 | -0.8% | |
$98.50 | $0.40 | 0.4% | |
$96.37 | $8.95 | 10.2% | |
$76,780 | $780 | 1.0% |
The Week Ahead
Economic Calendar
Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) - Fed Rate Decision and Press Conference (Wed 4/29 2:00p ET)
Inflation PCE Price Index & Personal Income and Outlays (Thu 4/30 8:30a ET)
Job Openings JOLTs (Tue 5/5 10:00a ET)
Notable Earnings
Amazon.com $AMZN ( ▼ 1.15% ) (Wed 4/29 after close)
Alphabet $GOOGL ( ▼ 1.07% ) (Wed 4/29 after close)
Microsoft $MSFT ( ▲ 3.05% ) (Wed 4/29 after close)
Meta Platforms $META ( ▼ 0.68% ) (Wed 4/29 after close)
Apple $AAPL ( ▲ 0.68% ) (Thu 4/30 after close)
On My Radar
Meta’s earnings are less about advertising strength and more about the AI spending narrative
Meta $META ( ▼ 0.68% ) reports after the close on Wednesday, 4/29. Expectations are roughly $55.4 billion in revenue and $6.67 in EPS. Those numbers are solid on their own, but they’re not what this report is really about.
This earnings call is about the $115 to $135 billion Meta plans to spend on AI infrastructure in 2026. That is nearly double what it spent last year. Zuckerberg is making a bet that would make most CEOs uncomfortable, and investors are still largely giving him the benefit of the doubt.
The ad business has been the engine funding all of it. AI-optimized targeting has helped keep revenue growth near 30% year-over-year, which is rare for a company of this size. If that continues, the spending story becomes much easier to defend.
But here’s the risk: eventually, the market needs to see what $130 billion buys beyond better ad placement. If guidance comes in cautious, or if Zuckerberg cannot clearly articulate the long-term return profile of that spend, today’s lack of sell ratings will not matter much tomorrow.

Daily chart of META over 1Y time interval
The recent bid has pushed the stock back toward the middle of its 52-week range. Without strong directional momentum, it’s difficult for me to lean aggressively bullish or bearish here. IV rank is elevated near 75 heading into earnings, and options are pricing in roughly a $45 expected move, or about 6.5% in either direction.
Zooming into the last quarter’s price action, support and resistance levels created by prior gaps could help contain the move. If price drifts back toward the middle of the recent zone near $665 into Wednesday’s close, I may look at selling a small iron condor to take advantage of the post-earnings volatility crush.
What’s Top of Mind
A busy life is not just a time management problem. It’s a capital allocation problem
A few weeks ago, I wrote about spring cleaning your priorities by running an 80/20 audit on your time, energy, and attention to figure out what actually deserves your capital.
That piece was about the audit. This one is about what comes after.
Once you identify what deserves your capital, you still have to deploy it correctly. And that is where a lot of people stall. They do the inventory, trim the obvious clutter, and still feel stretched, not because they are doing too much, but because they have not thought clearly about how much each commitment should actually get.
In trading, there is a useful distinction between being overextended and being fully invested. Overextended is fragile. Positions sized too large. No room to adjust. One bad print away from a forced decision.
Fully invested is different. Every unit of capital is deployed intentionally, each position sized appropriately relative to the whole. Nothing idle. Nothing wasted. But also nothing crowding out everything else.
Right now, my book is full.
On the personal side: a 7-month-old at home, a daily workout routine I protect, and enough sleep to function at a high level. On the professional side: the newsletter, active trading, and building a web app using AI tools I’m learning in real time.
That’s a lot of open positions. But I’m not stressed about it because I’m managing it the same way I would manage a portfolio. The key is position sizing.
Family is my largest holding. Non-negotiable. Core. Sized accordingly.
Daily workouts are smaller positions, but highly compounding ones. Twenty to twenty-five minutes added consistently can generate outsized long-term returns.
The newsletter and trading are my active book, requiring the most ongoing attention and adjustment.
The app is a speculative position. High upside potential, smallest allocation, and I’ve already accepted that it may take time before it pays off.
The same framework applies regardless of what your own book looks like.
Professionally, it might mean recognizing that not every meeting deserves a spot on your calendar. Some are low-leverage tasks disguised as collaboration. It could mean identifying the one client or project that’s actually driving your growth and giving it a disproportionate share of your week.
Personally, it might look like protecting the first hour of your morning before your phone tells you what to think about. It might be realizing your workout doesn’t need to last an hour to matter. Twenty focused minutes, properly sized into a busy day, compounds just like anything else.
The takeaway: a busy life is not just a time management problem. It is a capital allocation problem.
The 80/20 audit tells you what deserves your capital. Position sizing tells you how much.
Most people either over-concentrate in one area or spread themselves too thin to give anything meaningful attention. The goal is a full book where the right things get the right amount of capital.
Don’t let one “trade” consume so much mental or emotional capital that you lose the ability to manage the rest of your book when conditions change. Know your core positions. Know your speculative ones. Size accordingly.
The audit got you here. Now manage the portfolio.
Focus Points:
From Audit to Allocation: If you completed the 80/20 exercise, take it one step further and assign a rough “position size” to each priority. Does the time and energy you are allocating actually match its importance?
Right-size, Don't Just Cut: The goal is not fewer commitments. It’s making sure each one receives the appropriate amount of capital.
Protect Your Peak Hours: Identify when you’re sharpest during the day and guard that window for deep work. Don’t give your best hours to email and your leftover hours to the things that actually matter.
Thanks for reading this week!
If something sparked your interest — or you’ve got a hot take of your own — hit reply or find me at [email protected]. I read every email.
Hitting the Bid content is for informational and entertainment purposes only. The information contained is not, nor is it intended to be, trading or investment advice or a recommendation of any security, futures contract, digital asset or alike. I may hold a position in the trading vehicles discussed. Trading and investing contains risk. All investors should evaluate their own risk tolerance, financial situation, and investment duration before entering any trade or investment.


